Term Paper on Women in
Combat
Introduction
The question of women in combat has been prattled, legislated, analyzed, argued,
dissected, debated, and eschewed so often that this dead horse is ahead of the
glue factory. Stirred by harpies and seasoned by banshees, word jousting with
worn out barbs like upper body power, feminization, social research and a
gentler military, has shaped a rich debate soup for the media.
The answer to the entire enchilada about women in combat positions is this
wrongly alleged danger to male character.
It has more to do with emasculation, or possibly even masculinism, than it ever
will with social testing, feminism, and bodily power distinction or gender
norming. (userpages.com)
Order Your
Custom Term Papers, College Essays and Research Papers
Women in Combat
When a woman is properly skilled, she can be as dangerous as man, was the
conclusion of a study carried out by army researchers who had come up with a
novel study. The US Army Research Institute of Environmental Medicine at Natick,
led by senior analyst Everett Harman, MA reported "You don't need testosterone
to get strong,” more that 75 percent of the 41 women studied were talented
enough to put themselves into order to fruitfully perform duties usually carried
out by males in the military, through a regimen of weight training, regular
jogging, and other rigorous exercise. Furthermore, before training, less than 25
percent of the women were competent of staging the tasks. None had beforehand
assumed a habitual of demanding physical activity, and all but one of the
females was a civilian volunteer. The women included lawyers, mothers, students,
and bartenders. Most of them thought that the training would put them back in
shape for the reason that several recently had children. The last fort of
unfairness in opposition to women in both the military and society were at last
tumbled by this test and furthermore, the women were totally ignorant that their
feat is ultimately going to be used to topple this. The 24-week exercise study
commenced in May 1995 with women spending five days a week, 90 minutes a day,
building themselves up for survival tests. They executed squats holding a
100-pound barbell on their shoulder sand and they ran a two-mile wooded course
wearing a 75-pound rucksack. Countrywide certified trainers supervised the
training. The scientists who inscribed the report distinguished improvement of
over 33 percent. Almost at the same time as with this test, the Ministry of
Defense in Great Britain carried out a similar type of study. The Sunday Times
of London reported that "by using new methods of physical training, women can be
built up to the same levels of physical fitness as men of the same size and
build." The British article also notes "contrary to the view of many
traditionalists, the operational performance of groups improves greatly if both
sexes are involved." (aug.com)
Women have in general carried out about as well as most men had, whenever women
have found their way into combat. Women in combat bear roles, and have held
their own when situations occasionally positioned them in combat (especially in
guerrilla wars). Furthermore, have had little trouble fitting into military
organizations. They can fight; they can kill. Yet outstanding individual women
who wanted to go to war had to either overcome mulish struggle from men or adopt
male costume. (Goldstein, 2001)
Order Your
Custom Term Papers, College Essays and Research Papers
Conclusion
The reality is that there is utterly no intellectual, rational, levelheaded
reason for women not to be in combat roles with the technical style of conflict
that abounds today.
There are political, patriarchal, religious, and misogynistically unintelligent
motives to prevent women but they all belong in The Museum of Natural Idiocy
subsequent to senile senators, urban legends, chastity belts, promise creepers,
homophobia, military machismo and proselytizing preachers. The old-fashioned
notions that fill the congested minds of the "brotherhood of the sword", the
military establishment, with its tail clasped state of mind and its
martenetistic approach have shaped a brain-lock that has impured the whole thing
from the Congress to the media. (aug.com)
Works Cited
Barbara A. Wilson. Women in Combat - My Final Answer! November 13, 2001,
www.userpages.com
Barbara A. Wilson. Women in Combat Why Not? November 13, 2001,
www.aug.com
Joshua S. Goldstein. Women in Combat. Cambridge University Press. September
2001.
Order Your
Custom Term Papers, College Essays and Research Papers
